Its better combining CSS and Tables...in my part i use DIVS, but sometimes IE contradicts CSS..also FF..
so what i do most is just combining the two..para dili mahasul..
Its better combining CSS and Tables...in my part i use DIVS, but sometimes IE contradicts CSS..also FF..
so what i do most is just combining the two..para dili mahasul..
well tableless lng kung kaya... mas dali man dyud especially multiple pages imo buhaton na webby. and also pas2 pd ang loading... problem lang kai dapat you check compatibility sa browser...
Just my 2 cents worth :P
gOL
wala bitaw hehe... usik kaayo oras debug then ang output kay pareha ra... nya they say nga naay difference ig load - basin jud naa but ang difference dili worth it sa pag-sacrifice sa oras i-spend ug debug... tables man gud akong na-andan sukad sa una nya ang css kay for fonts and other stuff heheOriginally Posted by flashfreak
and mixing code with design - rarely happens if you plan well...
"but I also appreciate the SEO benefits of using CSS layouts. CSS layouts drastically reduce the amount of code in your site that isn't content that the user sees. Just like moving CSS and JavaScript to an external file, the less on-page code that isn't content, the better." Adam McFarland
... and I agree. Makes you wanna think SE algorithm is really tricky. I guess, just read a lot and weigh what they're saying and how your website is doing with tables and plenty of codes.
btaw maayo kaayo ni akong bosing sa una....Originally Posted by clarkhkent
kaya ra au tabless design. sample:
http://www.absoluteflow.com
if tabular ang mga data, pwde ka gamit ug tables. depende sa need. sample:
http://www.tusilog.com/
depende sa imo need...
if the page needs tabular data and requires less updates you can go with tables...
even big companies didnt ditch tables.. they use it when its appropriate...
Similar Threads |
|