True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

[cobraKing]

---

basa lng ko dri..kay walay idea sa inyohang topic dri...

[wormwoods]

As a science educator, I am warning the general public and the readers of this thread, that most of the so-called 'scientific explanations' you read in this thread are not at all scientific and thus you should refrain from teaching your kids the supposed 'facts' stipulated herein by creationists.

-RODION

Sir, i acknowledge you as a science educator but you can do nothing whatsoever to defy God's word. It is a fix truth that serves as a guide to mankind. God knows our limitations in that He reveals his power to us which we can only know in the bible.

Try to reconsider the value of your existence. If youre really into your atheistic belief that life is meaningless why bother to share your belief with others?

It is really hard for the majority to accept eventhough it was taught in school that we evolved from primates or simplier organisms. It is because we have this moral instinct built within us that is searching and longing for God which is totally undeniable. Therefore we are not just a product of mere matter & chance.

Be honest with yourself, bisan ikaw tingali nakafeel ana nga longing but its because dunay mga butang nga wala ka ma satisfy sa answer, you turned your back from God which is the most tragic decision you made sa imong kinabuhi even if youre succesful sa imong career.

Just try to ponder the grace of God in your life. Nindot jud kayo ug safe ta kung manginabuhi nga naa sa kamot sa ginoo and continue being successful in life.

[omniknight]

Pa off topic lng usa ko mga sir ha.. Thanks..


Salvation comes to everyone who believes. However, the validity of a man’s confession of faith is confirmed or proven false by his life. - Paul David Washer (@ Facebook May 21,2012).

[wormwoods]

I totally agree bro. and it aligns with the doctrine of the assurance of salvation.

God bless always!

[omniknight]

LUCY



“I expect that scientists, both evolutionists and creationists, will make a trip to the Creation Museum to see this exceptional exhibit, not only because it refutes Lucy as an ancestor of ours, but also due to its use of remarkable holographic technology,” declared Ken Ham, president of Answers in Genesis and the museum.

In a highly visual way, the exhibit conclusively shows that the fossil bones of Lucy belong to a knuckle-walking, ape-like creature. Menton points out that many evolutionists such as the well-known researcher Donald Johanson, the discoverer of “Lucy,” admit that Lucy’s V-shaped mandible was very ape-like, nothing like that of a human. In addition, Israeli scientists reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science that it may not be our ancestor, for its lower jaw bone resembles a gorilla’s.

In the new museum exhibit, a number of Lucy heads have been created, cast from the same mold. Each head, however, is given different skin and eye coloration, as well as variations in the amount and color of hair. This was done to demonstrate how significant artistic license can be employed by researchers in interpreting what Lucy resembled as they “put flesh to the bones” of the creature. There simply isn’t enough information found in the fossil bones for anyone to determine what Lucy looked like.






Stunning Exhibit Unveiled at Creation Museum - Answers in Genesis

[leo_trams]

True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

1656 ang flood? unsa ang exact date?

[wormwoods]

Starting from creation na nga date bro., dili na sya AD, BC na tanang date nga nakareflect diha. wala pa sad ang gregorian calendar anang panahuna.

[istoryamember]

do we need to know the true age of the universe? Either from science or from Bible, nobody knows kay bottom line ana, both sides gi interpret ra na ug tao nga parehas nato.

[omniknight]

do we need to know the true age of the universe? Either from science or from Bible, nobody knows kay bottom line ana, both sides gi interpret ra na ug tao nga parehas nato.

There is a need to know how we come to be and where we will be going after this life on earth.

Real Science based their facts on the Biblical Origin so di pwedi na ma separate.

There is no "Versus" in between.

The Theory of Evolution was already been disproved a long long time ago.

But atheists are still using them today only because they don't have any other choice.



================================================== =============

Dr. Etheridge, famous fossilologist of the British Museum, one of the highest authorities in the world, said: "Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species." Is a man in that position not a credible witness?

Prof. Beale, of King's College, London, a distinguished physiologist, said: "There is no evidence that man has descended from, or is, or was, in any way specially related to, any other organism in nature, through evolution, or by any other process. In support of all naturalistic conjectures concerning man's origin, there is not, at this time, a shadow of scientific evidence."

Prof Virchow, of Berlin, a naturalist of world wide fame, said: The attempt to find the transition from the .animal to man has ended in total failure. The middle link has not been found and never will be. Evolution is all nonsense. It can not be proved by science that man descended from the ape or from any other animal."

Prof. Fleishman, of Erlangen, who once accepted Darwinism, but after further investigation repudiated it, said: "The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it, in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but is purely the product of the imagination."

Prof. Agassiz, one of the greatest scientists of any age, said: "The theory [of the transmutation of species] is a scientific mistake, untrue in its facts, unscientific in its method, and mischievous in its tendency There is not a fact known to science, tending to show that a single kind has ever been transmuted into any other."

Dr. W. H. Thompson, former president of NY Academy of Medicine, said: "The Darwinian theory is now rejected by the majority of biologists, as absurdly inadequate. It is absurd to rank man among the animals. His so called fellow animals, the primates--gorilla, orang and chimpanzee--can do nothing truly human."

Sir William Dawson, an eminent geologist, of Canada, said: "The record of the rocks is decidedly against evolutionists, especially in the abrupt appearance of new forms under specific types, and without apparent predecessors...Paleontology furnishes no evidence as to the actual transformation of one species into another. No such case is certainly known. Nothing is known about the origin of man except what is told in Scripture."

The foremost evolutionists, Spencer, Huxley and Romanes, before their death, repudiated Darwinism. Haeckel alone supported the theory and that by forged evidence.

Dr. St. George Mivert, late professor of biology in the University College of Kensington, calls Darwinism a "puerile hypothesis."

Dr. James Orr, of Edinburgh University, says: "The greatest scientists and theologians of Europe are now pronouncing Darwinism to be absolutely dead."

Dr. Traas, a famous paleontologist, concludes: "The idea that mankind is descended from any simian species whatever, is certainly the most foolish ever put forth by a man writing on the history of man." Does this apply to H. G. Wells?

Dr. N. S. Shaler, professor of Geology, in Harvard University, said: "It is not yet proved that a single species of the two or three millions, now inhabiting the earth had been established solely or mainly, by the operation of natural selection."

Prof. Haeckel, a most extreme evolutionist, confesses: "Most modern investigators of science have come to the conclusion that the doctrine of evolution, and particularly Darwinism, is an error, and can not be maintained.

Prof. Huxley, said that evolution is "not proved and not provable."

Sir Charles Bell, Prof. of the University College of London, says: "Everything declares the species to have their origin in a distinct creation, not in a gradual variation from some original type."

================================================== =============

http://www.ldolphin.org/wmwilliams.html

[rodsky]

And also refrain from believing the CONCLUSIONS stipulated by Scientists just because their limited SCIENCE cannot explain it - Because History will show you that they will always change their Scientific Facts quite often

The only permanent thing in this universe is change.

-RODION