True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

[wormwoods]

---

thats pure speculation bro. sa preface nag quote pa ug verse sa bible.

[omniknight]

thats pure speculation bro. sa preface nag quote pa ug verse sa bible.

yup.. sakto ka bro, as Christians, we should be vigilant in guarding our hearts and minds so that dili dayon ta ma decieve and fall away to false prophecies and false doctrines. Di pasabot na tanan prophecy nga naay bible verse dili pasabot sakto dayon.

even God's chosen people are being decieved.

DECEIVING EVEN THE ELECT

dara nice i research about nephelims so called E.T.s, here's one that I consider as better.

kung if in case naa man gyd aliens..

....Post-Flood Occurrences

Regarding the Nephilim, Genesis 6:4 also includes the haunting phrase, "...and also after that...." Apparently these strange events were not confined just to the period before the Flood.

We find that there seems to be some recurrence of those things which resulted in unusual "giants" appearing in subsequent periods later in the Old Testament narrative, specifically the giant-races of Canaan.

There were a number of tribes such as the Rephaim, the Emim, the Horim, and Zamsummim, that were giants.1 The kingdom of Og, the King of Bashan, was the "land of the giants."2 Later, we also find Arba,3 Anak, and his seven sons (the "Anakim") also as giants, along with the famed Goliath4 and his four brothers....

Dr.Chuck Missler - Return of the Nephilim, Alien Existence, and Compatibility with Religion - Part 1 - YouTube

'And Also After That': The Return of the Nephilim? - Chuck Missler - Koinonia House

[P-Chan]

grabeha ka healty tingali ang living sa biblical times oie.. hehhe

[wormwoods]

we should rely to the immovable truths of the bible.

[omniknight]

Well, the atheists continue their attempts to mock Christianity in their ongoing billboard campaigns. One of the latest billboards supposedly discredits the worldwide Flood of Noah's Day. The atheists don't even realize the fallible assumptions behind their attempted mockery. For instance, they are assuming that the mountains today existed like this before the Flood. Actually, if one smoothed out the Mountains and ocean basins, there is already enough water to cover the entire earth with about 2 miles of water! The reason there are fossils on the tops of mountains (like Mt. Everest) is because such mountains were raised up at the end of the Flood. The mountains before the Flood were different to those today--and obviously not as high etc. Even secularists have mountains being raised up--but they have it happening slowly over supposed millions of years. They also assume all the water came from rain--which it did not. The Bible makes it clear that water came from the fountains of the great deep (from below) and from rain (above). - Ken Ham(@ Facebook).




NOAH’S FLOOD: 8712 INCHES PER HOUR=NONSENSE. WHAT OTHER BIBLICAL NONSENSE IS THERE? | Atheist Billboards

[rodsky]

As a science educator, I am warning the general public and the readers of this thread, that most of the so-called 'scientific explanations' you read in this thread are not at all scientific and thus you should refrain from teaching your kids the supposed 'facts' stipulated herein by creationists.

-RODION

[SioDenz]

And also refrain from believing the CONCLUSIONS stipulated by Scientists just because their limited SCIENCE cannot explain it - Because History will show you that they will always change their Scientific Facts quite often

[KlaytoN]

That's the beauty of science, it is self correcting. The key for the Bible's survival in this modern world lies in the believers who interpret it in such a way that is relevant with the times, compliant with modern science, and complement with the ever changing morals of our society.

This is why the Catholic Church is on the side of theistic evolution, they realized that even the Church has to keep up with the times.

[SioDenz]

That's the beauty of science, it is self correcting. The key for the Bible's survival in this modern world lies in the believers who interpret it in such a way that is relevant with the times, compliant with modern science, and complement with the ever changing morals of our society.

This is why the Catholic Church is on the side of theistic evolution, they realized that even the Church has to keep up with the times.

Unsay naka beauty anang imu i base imung pilosopiya sa butang nga mag cge lang ug kausab? mga butang nga sakto karun ugma sayop?

And i dont think ang sinuwat sa bibliya maoy ni adjust or comply sa Science kay ang idea teaching sa Biblya is Absolute. Ang science nuon cge ug pangita ug Proof nga sayop ang sinuwat sa Bibliya. Ang Science maoy maka Prove or Disprove sa sinuwat sa Bibliya so dili ang Bibliya maoy ni adjust sa Science.

[wormwoods]

IT is because TRUTH changed NOT with times/.

bisan unsa pa atong maabot nga knowledge as what the wisdom of Solomon says, it is a chasing after the wind. At the end of it we will realize that everything is vanity under the sun, meaning outside of God!

Ang depravity sa taw gud kay maka attain lang ug gamay nga success, instead loving God more i-disregard na hinuon. Mogawas ang pride sa uban ang would say to themselves that "ako na gud ni" without realizing that God is the one who holds his life, safety, composure etc..