correct me if im wrong, he needs 16 votes for a conviction and 6 votes for an acquittal?
correct me if im wrong, he needs 16 votes for a conviction and 6 votes for an acquittal?
nganong focus man mo sa SALN ug dollar deposits, nga luwas naman gyud si CJ ana nga issue tungod sa RA 6426.
unya unsaon na lang tong ang undeclared 80 Php million plus sa SALN. Although niingun siya nga comingled accounts to, mutuo na lang diay ta dayon sa kana nga alibi. Tanang public official mao na na ang buhaton, dili ko ibutang ang X million account sa ako SALN kay comingle na namu. Pila ra'y pagsulti nga comingle ang imu account. As the saying goes, blood is thicker than water, mao na pwede ra nato i care of sa usa ka tawu ang ato kwarta. pero 80 million is not "kwarta" lang. pang jackpot prize na na sa lotto.
why should i entrust my money to someone like corona nga public official, murag risky place kaayo i put under his name ang dako nga quantity kay basin muabot ang time nga magduda ang tawu nga ang kwarta is iyaha/iyahang kurakot/iyahang tong, not sponsored by relatives/comingled; like what is happening now... ako nagduda ko, ug dili lang siguro ako ang nagduda.
Sayang, wala nag-usisa ang mga kagalang-galang na congressman.
for me, 2 usd m, luwas na to sa foreign deposit confidentiality.
pero ang 80 php million as comingled, come on. convinced na mu sa iya explantion?
and hu's doing the mud-slinging? the fake docs presented by mr. anonymous?
so low of the prosecution to do that.. i totally understand why sen santiago ranted about that. they're trying to make the public believe all those lies they invented. so petty. clearly politicking. bahalag di maigo, they were flinging mud toward s cj hoping the public would believe that. i think most of us did. hook, line & sinker.
mag daog nalang ni depende sa interpretation sa atong constitution..
sa mga taw diri, cguro naa man mo vast knowledge about the constitution ang maayong laki man mo na mga abogado, aw then cguro sakto mo sa inyong mga interpretation..
"Constitution versus RA 6426
Salipsip said that the nondisclosure of dollar accounts by Corona is now the subject of interpretation of laws, since some senators believe Constitution should prevail over RA 6426.
"Some people are saying, the FCDU (law) came ahead, and the Constitution was much later, so they're saying it's the Constitution that must prevail," he said.
"I think most of us will believe that it's the Constitution that prevails because it says assets and liabilities. Your assets would include all kinds of money that you have including the dollar deposits that you have," he said."
puro raman crap posts ang anti corona here with some exception
if we analyze things kanang drama and wheelchair issue debatable pana, how about alleged 82 dollar accounts, 45 properties, 31 peso accounts, $12M, houses in the US, small lady, gate, mr. anonymous, Keh's testimonies, denial of 45 properties, fishing for evidences, unverified documents etc... harap2xan namo gi.ilad tuon lang gihaponeven sa fable "a boy who cried wolf" 2x is enough. now can you say GULLIBLE.
Similar Threads |
|