Article: Canon and Nikon: A Photographer's Comparison (Part 1)

[janmat]

---

the results are obvious.

go Canon.

[sevmik]

@sevmik: hi, sorry.. that was a typographical error there. that was supposed to be "And it's an EXPENSIVE one." hehehe.. thanks for quoting. edited already.

Oh, sorry. I thought it was meant to convey to beginners that they don't have to spend a lot to get good shots, which happens to be the most common turn-off aspect of photography. Most newbies man gud, when they look at other hobbyists' gears, they think nga all those dapat paliton, which isn't exactly true. That's what I thought this series could also provide, an insight into the camera itself and not the gears.

[Content Manager]

@sevmik: The upcoming articles will basically be related to what you said.. Thanks for reading!

[3enson]

Both brand renders color depth differently,
i have used both camera brands and others...
I'm a pixel peeper and always get in trouble with canon and nikon colors
and this is absolutely true,

Sensor's (CCD/CMOS/BSI-CMOS) and camera IQ affects this color process

[Sedgraphy]

Scientific study ---->>> DxOMark - Compare cameras side by side

[rayfloyd_170]

@sedgraphy: ikaw ni sedny arcilla? heheh nikon fan kaayo ni ba.. hehehe

[wonsters]

After reading this part I remember someone told me Nikon is better for landscape and Canon is better for portrait hehehe

[wonsters]

Sorry double post