Ang offensive ra sa video kay ang language niya dli ang gipang-enumerate--tinuod man 2.
Ang offensive ra sa video kay ang language niya dli ang gipang-enumerate--tinuod man 2.
ang nakapait pajud bai bisan naa nay na disgrasya di pa jud dayon trabahoon.ahaha. huwat pa ipa media para mo lihok. ahaha.
may gae lungag sa imbornal rana ang gipakita ha. wala na apil ang mga poste nga kahoy nga karaan nga katumbahon na nya higtan2 lang ug plastic straw nga higot.ahaka mag huwat pang naay matumbahan.
wa uroy ni sila mauwaw.ahaha.
Local leaders just cannot react well to criticism.
In a phone interview with Sun.Star Cebu yesterday, Andales said Sieczka should have called the attention of concerned government officials or agencies about his problems with the city before making the video.
And even if Jimmy S. called the city's attention, would there have been any action in response at all
Remember that the next election is next year already. Does Andales deserve your vote with the way he responded in the news? Is "persona non grata" the best he and other councilors could do?
Mao jud bai. Kung huna hunaon, gamay ra gali kaayo to ang 20 reasons ug mostly ato nila kay ma address jud sa government/individual "discipline"... Mao lagi ning hapit na ang eleksyon, kay abi ug nag trending man tong videoha, unya samot nga gi shoot sa Cebu, mosakay lagi dayon ning mga hinampak aron pud mosikat ni sila... tsk tsk tsk tsk....
tinuod man points anang americano..though cebu city rajud ang na focus, pero sadly , it's true...
Yes. Kay dako2x gyud ang na-damage aning tawhana. Pila baya pud ka milyon ang nagasto sa DOT para pag-promote sa tibuok pilipinas. Unya tungod aning kanahan nga kano, na-balewala tanan. Damay pa pati ang mga lugar nga way labot. Tungod lang sa ilang tinguha mosikat, gigamit nila ang ngalan sa Pilipinas. Declaring Jimmy Shitka as persona non grata is very logical. Ang tanan nga na-involve, bisaya man o langyaw angay lamang manubag sa damyos nga ilang nahimo.
Now bahin anang mga pipila ka concerns sa nahisgutang video (walay labot ang tuktugaok sa manok, ha.). Kun mo-cooperate lang ang tanang lumulupyo anang mga dapita, masolbad man gyud na. Kaapan lang aning uban kay gobyerno diretso ang i-blame. Basura sa kadalanan? Kinsa man ang nanglabay anang basuraha, ang gobyerno ba? Di ba kana ra man pung mga tawo anang lugara?
Traffic problem? Kinsa man ng mga way disiplinang driver? Taga Malacanang ba? Di ba mga cebuano ra pud? Unya nganong gobyerno sa Pilipinas man ang basolon?
Kaning mga nag-uyon lang aning video ni Jimmy Shitka, pareha ni sila'g kinaiya aning tawhana. Reklamador pero sa tinuod walay pakialam sa welfare sa kadaghanan. Basta makareklamo lang. Basta makadungog lang sila nga duna na sa'y nireklamo against sa gobyerno sa Pinas. Lipay na sila. Bahalag mas dautan pa ang epekto sa pagreklamo kaysa problema nga gireklamo, OK ra para nila. Bahalag gamiton sa mga langyaw ang ngalan sa pinas alang sa ilang hinakog nga tuyo, OK ra gihapon para aning mga tawhana.
Pinoy sila pero kay lagi ubos naman ang ilang pagtan-aw sa ilang pagkapilipino, dili gyud sila maapektahan sa mga pagpangdaut sa mga langyaw sa atong nasud. Malipay pa sila kun dauton ang pilipinas kay madamay man tanan. Sa panahon nga dauton ang tibuok nasud, ma-feel aning mga tawhana nga wala sila mag-inusara kay tibuok Pilipinas naman ang makaambit sa feeling of inferiority. Maong nagpasalamat sila ni Jimmy Shitka.
Let's solve our internal issues and let's send Jimmy back to his home country. Whiners like him can do nothing but dampen the spirit of loyal and concern citizens who do their best to take care and protect the place they call home.
Last edited by yanong_banikanhon; 03-19-2012 at 01:01 PM. Reason: typo: imbis 'angay', 'ayaw' akong na-type.
^^Ikaw bai, unsa man imong nabuhat para sa welfare sa kadaghanan? Or istorya ra pud ka kutob ani?
EDITORIAL - Problems define leaderships
(The Freeman) Updated March 19, 2012 12:00 AM Comments (4) View comments
An American named Jimmy Sieczka, who has taken up residence in Cebu, has come up with a video showing some of the things he does not like about Cebu. The video is now being shared in the social networking sites.
As expected, the video drew immediate reactions from Cebuanos, from private citizens to government officials. Some took the American’s complaints positively and viewed them as a challenge, others preferred to ignore the facts and chose to be haughty.
Mayor Michael Rama did the correct thing by saying the city government is now addressing the problems raised by Sieczka. But he went overboard by saying people might even be enticed to come and see for themselves the veracity of the American’s claims.
But just what are the things that so riled Sieczka? Among other things, he took umbrage at the piles of garbage on city streets, the hordes of child mendicants, the traffic gridlocks, and the constant and impatient honking by taxi drivers.
To these complaints, councilor Margot Osmeña took umbrage. Osmeña said Sieczka should go home to the United States if he does not like it here. That is an unfortunate reaction that does not solve the problem one way or the other.
Even if Sieczka takes Margot’s advice and goes home, he will still be leaving behind the problems he exposed, in all likelihood unsolved, because officials like Margot resent problems being pointed out.
Great leaders are happy to have problems pointed out because it gives them the opportunity to solve them. Poor leaders are those who daydream that life is all hunky-dory and get upset when told otherwise.
There was nothing in the Sieczka video that was not true, which is probably why Rama saw the futility of arguing against it. By rising up to the challenge, we now have a real chance to solve the problems which we know to exist, even without having somebody to point them out to us.
Similar Threads |
|