Originally Posted by
YellowSubmarine
The government should tell them to surrender first before negotiating for a compromise. If the MILF is really serious about the peace talk and settle for a compromise they should surrender first, but they probably think that having their own "force" can give them a leverage to make demands on the negotiation. So this is very unlikely to happen. This is a dilemma which I think the only real solution is to go to the extreme. Either give them what they want or finish their rebellion by going to war until the last one of them surrenders.
how can you bargain if you surrender?
Originally Posted by
balipseyev
As what Sri Lanka did to the Tamil Tigers...
can we afford something like this?
U.N. Report Says Tens of Thousands Killed in Sri Lanka Civil War
Video: Sri Lanka's Killing Fields
Originally Posted by
peewee_toot
yeah! sakto jd kaayo. they are asking too much mn sd gd...
who says what is "too little" and what is "too much"? from who's perspective are we looking at?
from the point of view of those who will be adversely affected by their claims of "ancestral domain", their claims would of course be "too much". yet for them who felt severely disenfranchised by the land grabbing of old, and the failed promises of ARMM, their demands are just right.
what we need to understand that each side of the conflict has
diametrically opposite interests which are fundamental to their everyday living. this is why it has escalated into an armed conflict in the first place.
again challenge now is to find a workable compromise that is acceptable to all parties involved. this is tougher than going to war, but then there is no easy way to peace. and this is why everybody needs to sit down and talk peace.
this is because peace with justice can never be "too much".