Vice Mayor Rodrigo Duterte flashes dirty finger at media critics

[Fallen6]

---

mga maau man gud ni sila

sa bible pa, ug naay taw nga walay sala maoy una mo labay sa bato nga ila gi gunitan ad2 sa babae nga naka sala.

sa kang duterte sad, ug knsay politiko nga mas daghan pag nabuhat niya maoy una mo file ug kaso para ma priso siya

why would you guys debate over something nga wala moy mabuhat kung puro lang mo sturya? if you think your a better politician then go up against him and try steal davao from him. much better if you try and lead the entire philippines.

puro nlng debate nya para sa asa? para sa garbo? maytag open minded tanan taw para mo dawat ug opinions and facts pero naa may dili open ug mind so its better to leave the topic nlng kay magka insultohay ra ang labas. pero if you enjoy the insults then dab2 pa ug ayo

[mio]

some civilians nga naaan criminals..

Paita pud ani uy. Grabe na kaayo

[orochimaru700]

We both know that it doesn't seem to work here in the Philippines, see, there are a lot of loopholes when it comes to election rules.

I'm actually getting your point, Duterte is gutsy and his behavior is improper for a gov't official. That no one's above the law. That's taken.

Now my point is, he was not the first official who has shown "kabastusan" on national TV. We've saw a lot of officials using foul words during interviews esp when they are pissed but why make this one a big issue? Because he's Duterte? He's Davao's man of steel? We're getting selective and it's resulting to city vs city out here.

In any case that these officials will be found guilty on administrative cases, whatsoever there is, what assurance can we hold that these people will not win the election in Davao again? Will those cases thrown against them pull them away from pursuing politics? I don't think so.

I just don't like the supposed comparison of Cebu and Davao because that's sidetrack. That's beside the point. The way of living here is far from how they live there. Cebuanos, Manileños, or any moralist groups can dislike Duterte's way, other officials can sue him down, but will Davao change their mind from voting him? That's the sad reality.

nailed it 100%
even if dli ta gusto, wla ta ka uyon sa pamaagi sa davao or sa ilang DDS, and even proven guilty 1 million times ang mga Duterte, still the people of Davao will vote for them, dli man kita ang mo botar kung kinsa ang ma official sa Davao, so argument ra gyud kutob...

Cebuanos, Manileños, or any moralist groups can dislike Duterte's way, other officials can sue him down, but will Davao change their mind from voting him? That's the sad reality.

absolutely true...

[xetelx]

If everyone who made a comment on this topic thinks they know so much, try living there first. Let's see kung ganahan paba mo mu balik sa Cebu especially if your source of income can also be found/made in davao.

A Duterte is wayyy better than any G4rc1a or all of them combined.

That's the thing, I can't earn the same figure in Davao what I am currently getting here in Cebu. I could lose my job today and find another one tomorrow with the same salary. I doubt you can do that in Davao.

Garcia does not rule Cebu, FYI.

[monroy]

Their votes count more than our right vs wrong arguments here.


Yes it's wrong, but that's whatdemocracy is for them, so what can we do aside from whining about it? Throw accusations on how better we are than the other? On how they are wrong and we are the righteous one? Can we sue everyone from Davao for supporting a supposed criminal? Nah, those papogi politicians out there are not even standing against Duterte, those so called "decent politicians" who have more influence than we do. Why not? Out of what? Ahmm...Fear? Now fear is above the law.

No. I may not live in Davao but I live in the PHILIPPINES which has laws that should be supreme over everyone, no exceptions. You are making the mistake of putting democracy at a pedestal, even putting it above the law. "Kai nibotar lagi ang taga Davao inya kusug kaau ilang supporta sa Dutertes di bale nalang ang balaud". Lol.. you're totally wrong and missing the point. Democracy is nothing without rule of law. First there must be obedience to the law, then there can be democracy. It's not the other way around.

So long as we live in the Philippines we will continue to demand justice be done according to our laws. If people of davao want a civil war, then they should declare it and separate themselves from the country we'll see how that goes for them...

and your wrong to think that we cant do anythiing about them if they violate our laws. if the courts convict them of a crime, if our president had balls and put his foot down demanding obedience to our laws, then even if 100% of the people of davao vote for him, its game over for the dutertes. We still have laws.

[dodong69]

ani nalang katong dili ganahan sa batasan ni duterte ingna nalang ninyo face to face si digong!
then tapos wanay lalis kinsay dili maayo o maayo.

[b0ty0k]

That's the thing, I can't earn the same figure in Davao what I am currently getting here in Cebu. I could lose my job today and find another one tomorrow with the same salary. I doubt you can do that in Davao.

Garcia does not rule Cebu, FYI.

absolutely!

[b0ty0k]

ani nalang katong dili ganahan sa batasan ni duterte ingna nalang ninyo face to face si digong!
then tapos wanay lalis kinsay dili maayo o maayo.

this is absurd. i d0nt think its necessary to do what you suggests.

[Baeybe_Bryce]

No. I may not live in Davao but I live in the PHILIPPINES which has laws that should be supreme over everyone, no exceptions. You are making the mistake of putting democracy at a pedestal, even putting it above the law.

The law that convicts the guilty.
The law of land that protects the rights of the victims and the suspects.

The law of land that judged Erap (your example). But where is he now? He ran for presidency last election right? See what I am saying?

The law of land that gave/gives nth chances to robbers, killers, rapists and criminals. Bail? Presidential Pardon? Anyone?

The law of land that gives amnesty to militants and their kinds. (after several deaths on our military)

"Kai nibotar lagi ang taga Davao inya kusug kaau ilang supporta sa Dutertes di bale nalang ang balaud". Lol.. you're totally wrong and missing the point.

I'm no saying he's innocent, I can't say he's guilty either. I don't personally know the guy. I'm no witness.

The man is innocent until proven guilty. The court should decide but when its just pure hearsay and accusations he will never be convicted.

So long as we live in the Philippines we will continue to demand justice be done according to our laws. If people of davao want a civil war, then they should declare it and separate themselves from the country we'll see how that goes for them...

Before Dutertes how many so-called law abiding Mayors served Davao? How was Davao before compare to now? Since law and democracy was written and implemented why do you think did it end this way?

No intentions will justify killing, morally. Period. So let's say if ever the man will be proven guilty, just in any case, tell me what's next?

Will the fight with vigilantes stop after the capture of the so-called "leader"? Will they? We can't even hunt down NPAs how much more those unknown, no-faced vigilantes roaming around us?

They seek for justice that the law that you know deprived them. Is it wrong? Yes. Is it fair? yes/no, yes for the victims and no for the moralists.

Democracy is nothing without rule of law. First there must be obedience to the law, then there can be democracy. It's not the other way around.

This is much too idealistic. Ideal and the right thing to do, I will give you credit for that. Now, how many do you think practices this? For long decades the law of land serves us all, where are we now?

and your wrong to think that we cant do anythiing about them if they violate our laws. if the courts convict them of a crime, if our president had balls and put his foot down demanding obedience to our laws, then even if 100% of the people of davao vote for him, its game over for the dutertes. We still have laws

Game over? That's funny, people easily forgive and forget. Hello Erap? Hello Jinggoy Estrada?


The law will stay and every unexpected decade we will be discussing such issues like these. Different people, different status but similar cases. I just hope our laws here are as effective as you think.


That's the irony of the written law that we have on this land.

[yiennahs]

The law that convicts the guilty.
The law of land that protects the rights of the victims and the suspects.

The law of land that judged Erap (your example). But where is he now? He ran for presidency last election right? See what I am saying?

The law of land that gave/gives nth chances to robbers, killers, rapists and criminals. Bail? Presidential Pardon? Anyone?

The law of land that gives amnesty to militants and their kinds. (after several deaths on our military)

is it really the law that's wrong or is it us?

No intentions will justify killing, morally. Period. So let's say if ever the man will be proven guilty, just in any case, tell me what's next?

Will the fight with vigilantes stop after the capture of the so-called "leader"? Will they? We can't even hunt down NPAs how much more those unknown, no-faced vigilantes roaming around us?

They seek for justice that the law that you know deprived them. Is it wrong? Yes. Is it fair? yes/no, yes for the victims and no for the moralists.

if killing the criminals is a great way to stop crimes... why is it not under the law of the land?