bsag unsa bsta maka FF lng! nyahahaha
it's so expensive.
for the price of either D700 or 5D body.
i can buy a Leica D-LUX 5, a Macbook Pro 13 and an IPAD 2. Just a perspective.
muapil ko ha... pasagdi lang basta mushare lang ko hehehe
FYI yob,
Nikon's 24-70mm is generally considered as better than the Canon 24-70mm
ang Nikon 16-35mm sad is on par or better than the 17-40mm
and ang 70-200mm IS II uhhmmm kani toss up or murag mas ok ang sa Canon hehe
if kana lang mga Zoom lenses ang imo iconsider you could basically go to either brand and I am sure you will be happy.
to the OP please consider the features of each camera, kung unsa nga feature set ang tanaw nimo mas needed nimo..
Pros with Canon 5DMKII
-Video is better
-Aftermarket support is a lot lot better
-high MP
Pros with Nikon D700
-very good AF
- very good solid build
-very good high ISO perf
-very customizable
My only complaint with Nikon is local support, Canon has a service center right here in Cebu... sa Nikon mangita pa kag asa ka mag paayo hehe
IMHO lang ni ako ha
Last edited by monk3y; 06-16-2011 at 03:43 PM.
You're using these on a crop body now? If you decide to get a 5D Mk2, you'll see a big difference in output from your crop body using these same lenses.
But what do you like to shoot? If landscapes and models, I'd choose the 5D. If sports and wildlife, I'd choose the D700.
The Nikon D700, resolution and video capability aside, trumps the 5Dmk2 in every way.
btw, the 24-70 canon - nikon lens test.
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM Lens Image Quality
i seems the canon looks better in this sharpness test
- i think this is the older nikon 24-70, the recent nano version could be much better
- the canon 24-70 is an older design
- the nikon is more expensive than the canon
anyway, both are great lenses
Similar Threads |
|