MERGED: CHINA: Next Superpower?

[jumper_stage]

---

Busa karon sugdan na nato pagpatay og mga chinese sa atong lugar aron magka gamay nalang sila!

[wikki]

the BS conspiracy im talking about is using it on US!!, not about having them (you failed to understand my posts.... to bad the level i used on that one is elementary), ikaw maoy simang...

wikipedia is publicly editable ive worked on wikipedia actually i am editing some articles there as what my job tells me...

last time i know, paga-asa is still philippines... so no matter if we built structures their post-ww2 or not...

backup you claims with solid proof... till then i will scrutinize the every word on your posts till there is no more to scrutinize, the imaturity of you post is pretty obvious ive been in this road before kid, im already back... show some proof first not replying with your nonse BS that you cant even back-up

KIG was claim by the philippines during the spanish colonization, it was redrawn couple of times.... but still kig is included... they didnt lost it before the war.... not all information is in wiki kid, try using internet wisely!!! remember during the spanish time there is no UNCLOS... so everyone can claim it....

until then everytime you posts, i will scrutinize every word, expect more from me, since you started it.... dont worry i will do it with the bounds of the rules of this forum... but my sarcasm cuts deep...!!!

backed it up!!

You said it yourself Wikipedia is openly editable in public and everyhting there is questionable at best, and yet you keep on asuming that I got my info the Wikipedia and from the Internet for that matter. You keep on asking for proof and yet you show non yourself.

I dont have any showable proof concerning chemical and biological arnaments heck not even pulibc records have these If you have them then do show Everything in the internet is edited to cater to its desired benifactor. The Spartley's isn't ours to begin with, the spanish were taking land through conquest during thier time but it doesn't mean its by law and right (history) as for the ph having those radio station built there while the land is still under dispute is a fine example of the squatter nature of this country. As for evidence concerning the Spratly Islands original owners or should I say settlers Archeological documentations are already there to support the facts of who where the original settlers of the Islands its a no brainer, you can even search the net for them if they haven't been taken down yet for anti propaganda.

Immaturity of my post?, do specificy and clarrify the immature nature of my post and post here clearly (IF you meant by me calling you names while you telling me to "STFU and all those BS comments for posting something that hurt the nature of your ego, who's immature again??), take a look at the post above mine now thats blatantly immature and quite frankly pure stupid to post on a forum where a good majority of the lurkers are Chinese, good luck on the guy above. To question others is neither immature nor impolite, since when did our culture adopt the US militray doctrine of "Dont Ask, Dont Tell" hmm?

btw: the conflict over the Spratley's isn't about the entire range of Islands but to the exceptional few that has a possibility of oil under it and by sheer luck it happens to be along the border of the Ph claimed islands and its Chinese and Viet counterpart. China, Vietnam, Cambodia and Taiwan have well stayed within range of thier claimed islands and have never went over the boundaries, while the ph has and will always go over for so called oil expeditions and especially those fishing boats. (be thankfull that those countries didn't even sink every damn fishing boat that went over the border).

[nowpress*]

we are not. Jet Li is too much for us. Lito Lapid is too old.

[wikki]

Oh you mean that China will definitely weaponize SARS or something deadlier than that to attack us? And that is a fact? How convenient.. tsk! tsk! tsk!... please re-read the post that I quoted and check if you missed something.. anyway it's not just the one that I quoted is the only thing that I was trying to pinpoint, I was too lazy to quote all Soul Doc's posts cause they're too many. If you missed my point, I apologize, my bad then..

What part of the post did I mention China weaponizing Sars? I only stated that IF and thats a big IF China went into war with another ABLE ( example nuclear powes: US, Russia, France, UK, Brazil, Israel) country they'd rather end it quickly using those kinds of weapons (NOT SARS) rather than loosing manpower and time rebuilding the economy both of which they value a lot.

They dont even need WMDs for us, a heavily armed missile cruiser and bombers will put our entire government to its knees no contest. The rest of the country isn't even relevant, the south would probably end up as a muslim state if our government were to collapse.

[mr_kyme]

China are keep producing babies to defend their nation, why can't we too?
So RH BIlls supporters dapat jud we should not implement RH BILLS ky d na nta
mka defend sa nation hehe Lol...toinks!

[noy.juan]

China are keep producing babies to defend their nation, why can't we too?
So RH BIlls supporters dapat jud we should not implement RH BILLS ky d na nta
mka defend sa nation hehe Lol...toinks!

china's population maybe big, they have ONE CHILD POLICY that any family who violates it will be dealt strictly...

[kajrot1]

wala man jd tay mabuhat ani alkansi man jd ta permi ^_^
alangan magpa isog2 ta samot piti ta..
ang ato lng jd ani para makabaws ta kay bitayon tong mga insik na drug lord na napriso dri sa atoa.

[noy.juan]

You said it yourself Wikipedia is openly editable in public and everyhting there is questionable at best, and yet you keep on asuming that I got my info the Wikipedia and from the Internet for that matter. You keep on asking for proof and yet you show non yourself.

i already did on my part i even posted a picture backing my posts while you on the other keep insisting on your claims with even showing something....

Immaturity of my post?, do specificy and clarrify the immature nature of my post and post here clearly (IF you meant by me calling you names while you telling me to "STFU and all those BS comments for posting something that hurt the nature of your ego, who's immature again??), take a look at the post above mine now thats blatantly immature and quite frankly pure stupid to post on a forum where a good majority of the lurkers are Chinese, good luck on the guy above. To question others is neither immature nor impolite, since when did our culture adopt the US militray doctrine of "Dont Ask, Dont Tell" hmm?

resulting in name calling is immature!.... and so homo...

ego? dugay rakay na nako gi kalimtan part, dili na productive.... whos ego is hurt that even resulted in name calling?

again show some proof sa.... kay humana ko ikaw wala pa.... again this another B$ posts of yours....

all i ask is you show some proof.... result man noon ug name calling.... tsk100x

grow up...

[Soul Doctor]

Hahaha... I can't believe that you've been consumed by this conspiracy theorists. Conspiracy theories are good but exaggerating them is kinda annoying.. What good is your theory when you can't provide a solid proof to back it up?

mao gani nga theory kay wala pa kay proof , DUH!

[tackielarla]

Saying that the Spratlys is owned by China because of some old maps is, to be blunt, IDIOCY! If we go by that logic, then we can say that all of Europe is owned by the Italians (Romans), or the whole of Asia is owned by the Mongols (Mongolia), or more than half of the world owned by the freakin' Her Majesty's Empire!!!