Wikipedia ka tuho an bah 100% or dli

[realfussion]

---

katuho an bah na ang wikipedia nah pwedi raman bisan kinsa ang mo edit sa ilang mga informations? though if you want instant report para school pwedi na cguro. butang lang sa source "WIKI"....

what do you think mga people?

[Metz]

its not 100% reliable kay ang initial content can be provided by ANYONE. Although naa silay verifiers to check the info, but I dont know how fast sila mo verify and how to determine if the information provided was verified by someone from wikipedia.

[bahiista]

tinood na nga open source ang wiki but naa man pod i think na sila screening persons...so kato dili dapat ibutang ila na tangtangon..

[c_cebrecus]

it's not just the devs of wikipedia who screen the entries but also the members themselves who put the entries.. they do cross-checking with other members, so i'd say wikipedia entries are "generally" correct.. besides, they have the sources also to back their articles..

[ta3]

An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility

FTA:
"This suggests that the accuracy of Wikipedia is high. However, the results should not be seen as support for Wikipedia as a totally reliable resource as, according to the experts, 13 percent of the articles contain mistakes."

[rambutan]

basic definitions, ok ra.. pero kanang mga laglom na info.. i do research more...

[Dondon]

Mao man gamit sa Wiki:Talk.

[AntitaniC]

ma ilhan man pud kung dili accurate ilang ge post... kai mo contradict sa uban... mas maau kuha pud mo lain source... dili man jud na sila 100% permi... sometimes naa ko ge search sa ila kuwang...

[gcc4426]

dli. bsag knsa man tngali pwde ma-edit ang gsuwat.

[fauxprophetess]

maka tuohan man tngai kai dra man ko tg kuha ug mga sources sa assynments hehehhe